If your lab only ever tests food destined for one country, you calibrate to one set of limits and move on. The moment a product crosses a border, that gets more complicated — and the reference point most of the world works from is Codex Alimentarius.
What Codex actually is
Codex Alimentarius isn't a single country's food law. It's a joint FAO/WHO body that sets internationally recognized food standards, and the relevant one here is the General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed (CXS 193-1995). First adopted in 1995 and revised repeatedly since, it lists maximum levels (MLs) for contaminants — including toxic elements like lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, and tin — across a wide range of food commodities.
Because Codex standards are referenced under the WTO's Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement, they function as the default benchmark in international food trade, even in countries that also maintain their own, sometimes stricter, national limits.
The guiding principle: as low as reasonably achievable
Codex's underlying philosophy for contaminants is ALARA — levels should be kept as low as reasonably achievable through good agricultural and manufacturing practice, informed by a formal risk assessment. That risk assessment work is done by JECFA (the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives), and the maximum levels themselves are developed and proposed by the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods (CCCF), which meets annually and reports back to the full Codex Alimentarius Commission for adoption.
That process matters for labs because it means the list of regulated commodity/element combinations isn't static. It grows and shifts as new risk assessments come in.
A moving target, not a fixed list
The most recent round of changes, adopted at the Commission's 47th session in November 2024, is a good example of how incrementally this standard evolves. That session added new lead MLs for a cluster of dried commodities — dried arils, dried floral parts, dried fruits and berries, dried paprika and sumac, dried Sichuan pepper and star anise, dried rhizomes and roots, and dried seeds and celery seeds — along with a new cadmium ML for quinoa and a sampling plan for methylmercury in fish.
Cadmium is a good illustration of how commodity-specific this gets. Rather than one blanket cadmium limit, Codex maintains separate MLs for leafy vegetables, stalk and stem vegetables, root and tuber vegetables, cereal grains, bivalve mollusks, cephalopods, cocoa powder and chocolate (tiered by cocoa solids content), natural mineral water, and food-grade salt — each added or revised on its own timeline as the science and trade priorities warranted it.
For a lab supporting exporters, importers, or distributors across multiple markets, that means the panel of elements and commodities you're expected to test against doesn't stay fixed. It expands.
Why this matters for calibration, not just compliance
Tracking regulatory text is one problem; being able to actually measure to it is another. Every new ML is only as useful as the lab's ability to detect and quantify that element, in that matrix, at that concentration — which means every addition to the Codex list is a potential new demand on a lab's calibration standards.
A lab that only recently needed to report cadmium in quinoa, or methylmercury in fish, needs a standard that covers it accurately, with values traceable back to a defensible source. Waiting on a catalog standard to catch up with a regulatory update isn't always fast enough, particularly for labs juggling both Codex MLs and a destination country's own regulation (EU Regulation (EU) 2023/915, for instance, which sets its own lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury limits that don't always mirror Codex exactly).
Where Inorganic Ventures fits in
This is where a standards manufacturer built around custom blending earns its keep. Rather than being limited to a fixed catalog, Inorganic Ventures has produced more than 55,000 approved custom standard formulations, all NIST-traceable and manufactured under ISO 17034 and ISO 17025 accreditation. When a new Codex ML lands on a commodity your lab hasn't tested before, or a customer needs a multi-element panel built around a specific regulatory list rather than a generic element menu, that's a custom blend conversation — not a wait for the catalog to expand.
The takeaway
Codex Alimentarius limits for toxic elements aren't a one-time checklist; they're a living standard that grows as new risk assessments come in. Labs supporting international trade need calibration standards that can keep pace with that growth, element by element and commodity by commodity. If your panel needs to expand to match a new Codex ML — or a specific export market's requirements — Inorganic Ventures can help you build the standard for it.
Looking to learn more? Connect with one of our Chemists!